I’ll be addressing this in class tomorrow, but I thought it made an excellent subject for a first article.
There has been a notable trend, particularly among politicians, to reduce the extent to which they are available to the media. The trend seems to have started with the PMO. Stephen Harper has been careful when he issues statements, downright laconic when dealing with the press.
This trend has been continued, to varying degrees, by both Dalton McGuinty and Tim Hudak, as the provincial campaign heats up.
Perhaps, most infamously of all, Mayor Rob Ford outright refuses to speak to the Star, one of the three largest newspapers in the country. Although, as reported in the article linked above, Councillor Adam Vaughan wants to change that.
The reasons why a politician might want to limit the extent to which newspapers have contact with him are clear enough. Newspapers are often seen as politically active, and if there is a disconnect between the perceived politics of a journalist and the politics of the politician, contact can rarely end well for both sides.
In public relations, we’ve been taught that we want to create win-win situations, in which both the journalist and the spokesperson for our client are able to benefit from the interaction. When one side of that equation breaks down it can be all-too-easy to just walk away.
But, in my opinion this is the wrong course of action, and a dangerous trend.
The reason why is perfectly clear.
Refusing to speak to a journalist won’t make him go away.
For a perfect example of this, consider the recent waterfront debate. Doug Ford announced a grand vision of Ferris wheels, monorails and mega-malls, an Atlantic City style tourist site, to replace the more sedate mixed commercial and residential plans put forward by Waterfront Toronto.
This plan backfired dramatically on the Ford brothers, as many citizens, most of the local media, and ultimately all of council decided not to support this reworked plan for the Toronto Portlands. One could suggest that the refusal of the Ford team to speak to the Star may have contributed to the galvanization of public support against them, but this refusal plays a more pronounced role now.
Just this morning the Star reported of meetings between the Ford brothers and a major developer, prior to the announcement of the Ford plan. To say that the article was unfavourable would be an understatement.
The article paints a picture that hints at back-room deals and an air of subterfuge that tip-toes on the edge of scandal. Two thirds of the way down the article, the entire response of the Ford team to this situation is summed up, “Neither Doug Ford nor Remtulla answered inquiries from the Star about the meetings.”
The end result is an article which is unwaveringly critical of the Ford administration, and one in which they had no opportunity to communicate their perspective.
This isn’t a matter of whether you support the Ford vision for the Portlands (thought I don’t). The issue here, the issue that should concern communicators is that, by refusing to speak to the media, the Ford team has effectively muted themselves, giving people who are not predisposed toward kind thoughts even more reason to be critical.
This will hurt the Ford administration far more than a sound bite to the Star ever would.